Belief A = a belief where EVERY moral principle can be destroyed by man.
Belief B = any other belief that's not Belief A. In other words, a belief where there exists at least ONE moral principle that cannot be destroyed by man.
.
.
.
(Now, would it be that much of a stretch to say Belief A is moral nihilism and Belief B is some form of moral absolutism?)
I suppose one can classify moral absolutism as at least one moral principle cannot be destroyed, moral nihilism as zero moral principles can be created, and moral relativism as moral principles can be created, but can also be destroyed. But I think if every moral principle can be destroyed, what good does it ultimately do to create one? Such a principle seems too weak to justify its creation. That's probably a matter of opinion.
ReplyDelete